Ann: ASX litigation - security for costs order, page-166

It's what happened.

The irony is that I was actually defending ISX on Twitter from comments being made by that person. We were arguing back and forth and then he DMed me and we argued back and forth further. He raised a number of historical issues with ISX, one's id know about but thought were in the past. He then sent me the report.

I sent a copy of the report to JK and asked for his take on it.

I came on here to tell people in good faith that what I thought was a "short report" existed. apparently it's actually called a "governance report" whatever.

I never "shorted" isx, I've never shorted any stock actually and don't even have an account set up to do so even if I wanted.

most importantly is that report didn't have anything non public in it. it reiterated public info and posed questions to isx management. no different to the buy side reports that Marty Jacobs used to write on isx. someone sending around Marty's research reports wouldn't be any different.

anyway, that's what happened. there are people on here I used to speak to that know the above as I told them that at the time 3 odd years ago.

just be prepared for the narrative to change and isx to cut its losses with asx as its " a distraction from growth" or something .