Hello friend.
In the interest of transparency lets just say no one posts incessant negative spin without ever admitting there are some genuine questions to be asked of MO and VISA, unless they have an agenda. That bit is clear.
What isn't clear is your motivation, but that matters less than the former and the appended pernicious innuendo.
Lets revisit VISA and as you've put it "the largest most powerful corporations in the world". We know corporations have a reputation of circumventing ethics. We don't need go any further than Australian banks and Casino's who have dealt in kiddie porn, stealing from the dead, money laundering and other such immoral actions / behavior. Lets remember these are local institutions with a significantly smaller footprint than Visa "the largest most powerful corporations in the world".
Given whats been written in Post #: 64228243, a small sample of the sort of behavior that has been committed locally, do we really think Visa would not adopt this behavior systemically globally and kill competitors when ever the opportunity arose. Did they look at the shambles the MO created for ISX as an opportunity to do exactly that, thinking it was a god-send? No other regulator or commercial partner has - not one. Just Visa who has significant history of doing so.
So you statement that they are "the largest most powerful corporations in the world" is an dead weight to your argument, not because of they are large and powerful, but because they use that power to kill competitors and fund legal obfuscation to their massive Ponzi schemes. Simply the cost of doing business.
Despite the overwhelming evidence to support the above assertions, you are still here 3+ years later and thousands of posts talking about ISX, but nothing on the Casino's. Banks, Visa, Mastercard, etc. Not a single sentence. What very odd vested interest behavior. And because of it, I know there's something hiding in the woodpile that will vindicate and absolve ISX from the "spitballing" nonsense from the MO. Every post you write is brick of evidence of that likelihood and an opportunity to reaffirm how the shadow men work.
Keep them coming friend.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- Ann: ASX litigation - security for costs order
Ann: ASX litigation - security for costs order, page-263
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 76 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SP1 (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SBW
SHEKEL BRAINWEIGH LTD
Dani Nadri, Country Manager Australia
Dani Nadri
Country Manager Australia
SPONSORED BY The Market Online