.
Hi
@ChillingOutThe rules sound great hey. Good in theory only imo. The parties know the rules are that pliable that they can bend the system to suit.
This post is purely based on my observations from the various court proceedings I’ve observed and from the court orders released. In the almost 3 years these various court cases have been running nothing has played out as these few rules you quoted from my perspective.
The sub rules in place are obviously there to get any extensions required with the proper excuses of course. It’s all above board obtaining extensions and that’s why both parties use the system to there own advantage, because they can, and they know it. Of course there within the guidelines but it gets the result there seeking to draw out the proceedings, and of course it’s all legit. It’s beautiful and full proof.
There’s no problem getting time extensions through the courts from what I’ve seen. Every 3 or 4 weeks they reconvene once again and kick the can down the road once again. The system loves it, drawing the cases on as long as you can. There’s no accountable for adhering to timeline what so ever from what I’ve seen provided you play by the rules.
The courts won’t do anything regarding delays as long as you keep them in the loop imo. I haven’t seen the book thrown at anyone yet for delays. Delays are just common occurrence imo. The rules are only there to eventually achieve a result after every other avenue is exhausted to achieve the desired outcome sought by either party.
SP1 would have a good reason for the security funds being delayed = extension time. The precedent been set dozens of times already. This delay will be just another one.
Let’s face it, if everyone was serious and working for the good of the system and playing by the few rules as quoted, this circus would have been resolved 18 months ago easily.
Have a great day. Cheers
.
