Bit weird. I dont understand what the ASX beef is. All PR1 has stated based on historical sampling is that there is spodumene present.as well as some other minerals in an assemblage They are not providing a quantitative visual estimate , just saying its observable. How many other junior explorers report on the fist-pass exploration that some mineral or another is present based on visuals and they have not got a JORC deposit, its just a look see. One rule for one, another rule for another ?
Ann: ASX Retraction and Clarification Statement, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
