Which part of the article is wrong? The content of the latest article that he wrote is not really subjective. I would agree with you if what he wrote was all subjective opinions but that is not it in this case. People should focus on the content instead of the person writing it. To illustrate, a child rapist could say that the chemical formula for water is H2O, and he would be correct regardless of who he is as a person.
I think people should read for themselves, search for AFR articles titled:
"Karantzis sneaks double Cyprus sandwich past iSignthis auditor"
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: ASX update on suspension of ISX securities
Which part of the article is wrong? The content of the latest...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 109 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)