The director of IMMO (one of the contracts) was signed by Pesek (sole director) 5 days after he had already resigned as sole director of said company?
Another contract was with a company that had only registered with ASIC 8 weeks prior, as an entity?
Another contract wasn't even signed by either party?
All these contract were same or very similar in nature and on each occasion the revenue simply dropped away once June 30 (preference share date) passed?
These contracts were material in nature as they were a fair percentage of the total revenue generated so from my understanding needed full market disclosure?
Yes one can finger point that the ASX didn't take earlier action but that is a bit contrite given ISX believe the contracts are all legitimate, if so then why would ASX have the need to take action earlier?
They do somewhat rely upon other professions such as auditors to do their job
ISX Price at posting:
$1.07 Sentiment: Sell Disclosure: Not Held
