I am seeing similar garbage to that you refer to from disgruntled (ex)holders on other stocks also.
It’s actually pathetic, especially when you consider that most/all of them speak as armchair experts, vocally criticising after the fact, and often making absurd claims about what “should have” been done “better”.
No-one can say the asset is crap, or worthless, and imo the company is largely “struggling” due to pricing and sentiment….. afaict they have capacity to slow down very considerably IF circumstances require, and although they have taken a risk with building the ponds already, that was a risk that they determined to be reasonable - people had ample time to bail when they started the build, if they truly believed that was a fundamentally flawed approach. The price then was circa 70c iirc.
Using hindsight to say “they should never have started without full funding secured” is laughable.
imo watch how quickly all this is forgotten when pricing and sentiment significantly improves , and deals eventuate, and everyone is happy again…
In the meantime…Peak FUD = peak opportunity.
(20min delay)