Hi oilman,
From what I have read, the C18/19 in Atzam 2 showed potential too before issues arose and the casing split and cement poured into this level and decreased the permiablity or porosity. So it too is productive besides the other intervals.
Another question for you if you can answer it, is why in 2012 all around the same time CTR, Quetzal and I believe PetroLina all had name changes who all had dealings in these leases about the same time. Still trying to find more on LAR where they fit in.
Atzam 2 initially had IP of 1200/day but shut in and after rework yrs back only 50/day but shut in again. There was long periods of time with no workings on the wells.
No doubt this is a big intricate web of dealings among them and Greg Smith of LAR and in with SOCA of Ranges subsidiary or whatever the association is a big player in this.
Found this too.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ETR
- Ann: Atzam 4 - Project Update
Ann: Atzam 4 - Project Update , page-36
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 48 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ETR (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.88M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
ETR (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable