got to compare apples with apples and we cant with CLQ. Firstly we have near 300% more shares in circulation. They have the ionization patents and the water division, none of which we have here. the water division is aimed at being cash flow positive later this year.
So very different beasts for a direct comparison, I have been the long ride on both and dont see that you can easily compare.
got to compare apples with apples and we cant with CLQ. Firstly...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 183 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AUZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.58M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.9¢ | 1.0¢ | 0.9¢ | $5.142K | 549.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 2395023 | 0.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0¢ | 9018894 | 28 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.45pm 24/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AUZ (ASX) Chart |