I’ll try to explain what’s really going on here and why this may...

I’ll try to explain what’s really going on here and why this may actually work in ESR’s favour long term.

Yesterday ESR issued a writ in the WA Supreme Court against AWJ, its subsidiary Widgie Gold, Neometals (NMT), and WIN Metals (WIN) over what it believes are wrongful dealings in lithium rights and royalties at the Munda project. This isn’t a baseless swing, ESR flagged this dispute months ago, and it’s clear they’ve chosen to escalate now that commercial negotiations have failed.

So what is ESR actually claiming?

In simple terms: ESR asserts that it retains contractual entitlements to lithium rights and/or royalties over part of the Munda tenement. These rights appear to stem from prior commercial dealings or legacy agreements with WIN Metals or Mt Edwards Critical Metals (WIN’s subsidiary). WIN, however, on-sold or assigned some of those rights to Auric Mining last year, who paid $1.2 million to acquire them.

Auric and WIN claim everything was settled cleanly, even issuing ASX announcements in July and August 2024 confirming “completion.” But ESR publicly disputed this in September 2024 and again in follow-up commentary. Now, they’ve put the issue before the courts.

Why now?

From what I can gather, ESR is acting to protect a potential future revenue stream from lithium, which could become extremely valuable given Munda's known prospectivity and current market conditions. If they sit on their hands and let others profit from rights they believe are theirs, it weakens their position both legally and commercially.

It’s also worth noting that this move doesn’t appear to be desperate. ESR is fully funded for its drilling campaign in Timor-Leste and appears to have enough balance sheet strength to run the legal course. It’s not a bet-the-company moment, it’s more like ensuring the company is not cut out of a future upside that should rightfully include them.

Strategic Outlook

While legal action is never a quick win, this reinforces that management is focused on defending shareholder value. If ESR has a genuine claim (and I believe they do, or this wouldn’t have progressed to writ stage), then it’s worth pursuing.

Auric has stated they will “vigorously defend” the claim, but that’s to be expected. The courts will sort it out, but in the meantime, ESR has taken a principled stand.

Final Thought:

Yes, legal costs will be a line item but if this secures a lithium royalty or even a settlement down the line, the reward may far outweigh the risk. And in the bigger picture, it’s a sign ESR is not going to be trampled over. They’re playing to win — not to watch from the sidelines.

Wouldn’t mind hearing other thoughts, especially if anyone’s dug deeper into the original agreements that may be behind this.