Ann: Becoming a substantial holder , page-8

From the FRA site...."We have always had the goal of being a participant in the development of specialized programs for...individual companies, providing them with consulting customized to meet their particular needs and with the end result always in view."

So, Andrew Doyle is one smart, successful, highly experienced operator, particularly in risk management.

Questions:

1. Is AD a passive shareholder, or is he also engaged in providing customized consulting to meet MST's needs?

2. What does he know that we don't, in terms of due diligence, that convinced him the risk of becoming a substantial shareholder on MST was justified/worthwhile?

3. What "end result" does he have in sight for his substantial shareholding?

4. If the end result IS in sight, what's the time frame - short, medium, long?

5. Is he working on behalf of/in conjunction with anyone else, or is this an individual risk-reward investment?

I'm sure there are other questions, but that's enough to be going on with. Would appreciate other's thoughts...