I’m starting to wonder if the trading halt and postponement was...

I’m starting to wonder if the trading halt and postponement was a strategic move! If NetComm knew by the vote already in, that it was going to fail, perhaps a postponement would allow institutions to juggle their positions, as just happened, to improve the odds of the YES vote?

If these 9 mil votes swing the outcome, is there any legal avenue to void it.

The sp is now pushing back up, suggesting the market thinks the YES is now more likely.

Can the NetComm board communicate with larger holders and institutions to help swing a vote?