Would it be ideal for these two firms (Regal and Perennial) if the price hits $0.0, what nonsense we're talking about?
I can understand firms try to keep down raming (selling to small volumes to each other) until week hands either fade-up and decide to move on to the more attractive investment while they accumulate, averaging down price. Doesn't that apply to every potential growth-share, when an investment company sees an opportunity? or my understanding of the share market is wrong?
Would it be ideal for these two firms (Regal and Perennial) if...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add HYD (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.559M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82 | 1.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5¢ | 850000 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| HYD (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable