Question: quickly glancing through the pdf, are they the actually shorters or the one lending shares to shorters? Looks like they were lending shares to GS and others.
I guess you can't become a substancial holder if you don't own shares, right? Which means they cant be short AND own that many shares at the same time?
Maybe they are know as a group who's specialized in lending and can be seen as shorters themselves if that's the case.
If anyone can confirm I understand this correctly, this would be greatly appreciated!
Question: quickly glancing through the pdf, are they the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 34 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CXO (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
9.0¢ |
Change
-0.001(1.10%) |
Mkt cap ! $192.3M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 9.0¢ | 9.6¢ | 9.0¢ | $1.362M | 14.91M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | 2946389 | 9.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 9.1¢ | 200000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CXO (ASX) Chart |