If it has filed a notice of substantial holding it means it holds that stock and is long and holds >5% of the company.
The transactions show that these purchases were made on market.
I don't understand where the doubt is coming from from these disclosures?
If a fund was short the shares they would certainly not be filing a substantial notice saying it held >5% of the company.
Ann: Becoming a substantial holder, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AZJ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$3.58 |
Change
-0.050(1.38%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.589B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $3.62 | $3.65 | $3.57 | $19.43M | 5.408M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 30614 | $3.58 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $3.59 | 74908 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 22/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AZJ (ASX) Chart |