I know Regal has been involved with RED before.
However, why would they increase their holding in the company and then lend their shares to shorters for a pittance in fees and then see the shorters destroy the share-price?
Maybe Regal actually see a bit of value investing in RED at current levels.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RED
- Ann: Becoming a substantial holder
Ann: Becoming a substantial holder, page-8
Featured News
Add RED (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
35.5¢ |
Change
0.010(2.90%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.414B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
36.0¢ | 36.5¢ | 35.3¢ | $9.516M | 26.60M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 331651 | 35.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
36.0¢ | 409958 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
7 | 321651 | 0.355 |
13 | 712624 | 0.350 |
14 | 1110700 | 0.345 |
23 | 957726 | 0.340 |
18 | 946608 | 0.335 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.360 | 201358 | 6 |
0.365 | 355277 | 9 |
0.370 | 426218 | 14 |
0.375 | 503169 | 10 |
0.380 | 728719 | 9 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RED (ASX) Chart |