If an institutional holder did not know about the name change and are now concerned then the person responsible should no longer be employed. This was all public knowledge. Also why would institutional holders be reading HC, if they are getting their info from HC then they should also not be employed. I think you have either discredited any further statements you make or are deliberately trying to spin doubt. Either way I question your intelligence and or integrity.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BIG
- Ann: Big Un Limited Announce U.S.Update
Ann: Big Un Limited Announce U.S.Update, page-81
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BIG (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$2.22 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $388.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |