“In Jan 2020 WFE basically stated they were giving up on the cobalt plant because they couldn't comply with the requirements.”
No, they say they could adequately address concerns........... The advice given focused on accounts not submitted but that was dependent on ASX clarifying its position.
Why would a lawyer specialising in ASX regulation and corporation law need clarification if it’s all so crystal clear as you make out?
The ASX would surely not allow WFE to point the finger at ASX’s circumspection if it wasn’t an accurate representation.
As for “in principle” offtake............. whether that is intended to be binding, and if so, at what point, and on what terms would need clarification. It’s not literally lip-speak........... Obviously being not in suspension may have been conditional.
All IMO & DYOR
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFE
- Ann: Binding Heads of Agreement - Cobalt Production Facility JV
Ann: Binding Heads of Agreement - Cobalt Production Facility JV, page-552
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 178 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFE (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online