source:https://www.melbana.com/site/cpfile/9a739fca-e643-4012-83eb-94d230ef960e/MAYEVO20230605.pdf
That is incorrect.
You are attributing the back costs for block 9 expenditure prior to the JV as part of the exploration costs for the Alameda-1 and Zapato. In other words, the $5million to Melbana cannot be considered as "total (2 wells)" which is what your excel spreadsheet claims it is.
As for your middle grey columns, what is the point of converting expenses and back payments to 70%/30% if we know it was meant to be 85%? (it doesn't help us especially because Zapato+Alameda-1 were not of equal length and expense compared to Alameda-2 + Alameda-3).
The middle grey columns are fictional, the total (1 wells) scenario is fictional... This doesn't help the accounting cause at all.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MAY
- Ann: Block 9 Alameda 3 Appraisal Update (Alameda reservoir)
Ann: Block 9 Alameda 3 Appraisal Update (Alameda reservoir), page-764
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 219 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MAY (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
2.3¢ |
Change
-0.001(4.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $77.51M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.4¢ | 2.4¢ | 2.3¢ | $28.67K | 1.197M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 1822498 | 2.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.4¢ | 272423 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 1822498 | 0.023 |
13 | 3200422 | 0.022 |
15 | 1835442 | 0.021 |
15 | 2396251 | 0.020 |
4 | 824660 | 0.019 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.024 | 272423 | 3 |
0.025 | 1749601 | 12 |
0.026 | 2175955 | 4 |
0.027 | 1230434 | 2 |
0.028 | 1003439 | 5 |
Last trade - 15.57pm 28/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
MAY (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
UNT
UNITH LTD
Idan Schmorak, CEO
Idan Schmorak
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online