Yes, I wrote that post as a question statement, not as if I have any expertise so I was hoping for a rebuttal or confirmation from a learned soul.
If correct then all the chatter about acid, muds or sidetracks is irrelevant unless Alameda is also a dud when a sidetrack or acid could be part of a revision.
In short if my assumption is right then Marti is lost. Another failure until the next deep well. 2 to 0 geology vs Mx. Al 1 and Marti. 3 in Toto with Zapato.
Ann: Block 9, Alameda-3 Appraisal Update, page-439
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 309 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
