Ann: Board Restructure, page-52

it's healthy discussion, although I can probably come across a little condescending at times it forces you to validate your assumptions.

often when a few curly ones get thrown by people raising concerns the argument of the forum can at times be weak which probably then validates the concerns as real risks.

I genuinely don't have issues with non-holder or alternate views as I try to be somewhat conservative myself. people would have seen myself and stakx disagreeing at times because maybe I was being conservative.

I occasionally post as a non holder and there's nothing worse than having the forum unnecessarily take cheap shots and discredit the discussions, I try to keep the same level of respect. if people are transparent about intentions, are balanced in their discussions then I welcome them here. Some points are actually valid and investors should be informed.

it's when you get the low value snipes or opinion swing based on trade strategy that I become a little vexatious.

SF2TH