Not comparing businesses, BRN is BRN and SGH is/was a seperate...

Not comparing businesses, BRN is BRN and SGH is/was a seperate beast but when SGH was nosediving management and board were still holding hands out and then some for performance bonuses. People concluded it was in their 'best interest' to give those leaches more blood as if they didn't then their investment would somehow be diminished or worse the entire company would collapse because the people being paid an exorbitant amount of money wouldn't be motivated to do their jobs, we all know now how that turned out.... lets look at the facts: share price is tanking, no contracts, more and more sales mouths to feed that arnt producing squat, constant carrots being dangled ( Akida, being acquired for big $, Casino deals, vast expanses of surveillance in France bringing in $, brainchio studio will be flying off the shelf.) I'll vote yes if they can explain how my ownership of the company has improved financially by their tenure because all I can read in the financial report every time one comes out is loss statements. Why should they benefit financially when they can't deliver a profit?