Are you suggesting the recovery is 93% even if they didn’t have a POX plant? because that’s not what the met results show. The recovery to concentrate prior to POX is 93%. If that concentrate didn’t have POX treatment the gold recovery would likely be sub-economic (maybe <70%). Another way of thinking about this, most gold plants have recoveries the order of 90% so why would they even consider the idea spending $300M for POX?
Ann: Brolga mineralisation extends toward Aquila and Scooby Zones, page-108
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 35 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add DEG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.24 |
Change
-0.010(0.80%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.959B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.25 | $1.27 | $1.23 | $8.902M | 7.137M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 62364 | $1.23 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.24 | 1000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 17/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| DEG (ASX) Chart |