There's a difference between getting the seismic back and having something to release.
It takes a long time to get a meaningful interpretation out of seismic. It may not have even worked at delineating pegmatites.
I'm personally surprised they went this route. I would have thought there is too small a density contrast and too thin units for it to work.
But yeh. I suspect as well that results are in but they are sitting with a 3rd party and going back and forth with interpretations.
There has also been little info on what they did. Conventional? 2D? 3D? Or just passive seismic? Concentional seismic is expensive and generally targets far too deep for what's useful at this project.
There's a difference between getting the seismic back and...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 64 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add TG6 (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
20.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.38%) |
Mkt cap ! $14.57M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 20.0¢ | 21.0¢ | 20.0¢ | $36.84K | 178.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 12438 | 20.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 22.0¢ | 79000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| TG6 (ASX) Chart |