Looks like the 40N section is showing that the Porphry is there, and maybe a little thicker than the porphry alteration on the 0N section but the question that everyone is asking will be, is the gold there?
I'm wondering why everyone is hanging out for the results for LEFD004 - its just duplicating the trajectory of LEFR260 and will see pretty much the same rocks - anything different than 38m at 7.6g/T Au and 0.56% Cu would be fairly surprising and have some interesting implications for geological continuity.
Looks like the 40N section is showing that the Porphry is there,...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LEX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
9.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(1.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $19.84M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 9.9¢ | 9.9¢ | 9.9¢ | $1.367K | 13.80K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 200000 | 9.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0¢ | 99079 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.35pm 09/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
9.9¢ |
Change
-0.001 ( 2.06 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 9.9¢ | 9.9¢ | 9.9¢ | 16991 | ||
| Last updated 14.23pm 09/05/2024 ? | |||||
| LEX (ASX) Chart |