Conspiracy level thoughts here, but I'm curious how this works for companies like this in general.
DISC: used to hold, got fed up, but still watch
We know DGR management also have hands in the subs directly, we also know that DGR has done a LOT of raising from its shareholders. What is to stop management from effectively "sacrificing" DGR to help the subs? It would ostensibly hurt them, but may result in a net win for the subs. And let's face it, most of the money DGR has has been raised from holders.
I guess I'm asking: when do people start worrying that DGR's existence is not beneficial to the holders of DGR itself?
Ann: Business Update-DGR.AX, page-7
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add DGR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.3¢ |
Change
-0.002(13.3%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.56M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.4¢ | 1.4¢ | 1.3¢ | $38.94K | 2.967M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 981216 | 1.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4¢ | 268000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.08pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| DGR (ASX) Chart |