Conspiracy level thoughts here, but I'm curious how this works for companies like this in general.
DISC: used to hold, got fed up, but still watch
We know DGR management also have hands in the subs directly, we also know that DGR has done a LOT of raising from its shareholders. What is to stop management from effectively "sacrificing" DGR to help the subs? It would ostensibly hurt them, but may result in a net win for the subs. And let's face it, most of the money DGR has has been raised from holders.
I guess I'm asking: when do people start worrying that DGR's existence is not beneficial to the holders of DGR itself?
Conspiracy level thoughts here, but I'm curious how this works...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add DGR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.3¢ |
Change
-0.003(11.5%) |
Mkt cap ! $24.00M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.6¢ | 2.6¢ | 2.0¢ | $646.7K | 28.69M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1321645 | 2.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3¢ | 401784 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 18/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| DGR (ASX) Chart |