That’s ok you’re allowed to disagree alfzz4! But I’m looking at it from an overall perspective. I’m not saying the Cachi area isn’t compelling, far from it but nearology is not a sound strategy. I’m surmising what’s best for the company and the shareholders in the now. E2m have a tight register, 150m shares. NPM - 6 billion. Cost of drilling in Patagonia very expensive, pretty soon they’ll have to raise again taking the soi to what 7.5 - 8 billion? that’s assuming the market will absorb the raise. By the look of the ann they are now eyeing drilling Los Op, a lease that has had a lot of drilling, two companies but both decided it wasn’t worth pursuing. At the very least they should forget about Los Op and keep pumping Cachi as there’s a high risk that they’ll merely repeat the so so results of the preceding two companies being no lightweight Teck and Genesis.
I’m saying in the interests of we the shareholders in the short term we are owed a sober rethink and go where the highest likelihood of success in terms of where thick, high gold grade gold exists, and anyone who has looked at the in depth geo reports from GTK will say that that prospect is Hopeavuori.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
