I appreciate what you're saying re funding required to develop exploration but the reply to whatsup regarding whether they contributed or not to the recent raise shouldn't be a requirement as to whether they have the right to state their opinion. This has been a fairly stock standard reply by a lot of LT holders to what appears to be new investors commenting on the likelihood of a ROI through current/future exploration.
Yes there are a lot of posters stating what would appear to be the obvious and their desire to see some sort of positive news flow. I've personally invested well over $100k into ICG and held since before our former female Director resigned. My current average price is 15c and I would love to, at the very least, see a break even point some time in the next few years, but that doesn't mean that I can't feel free to express my opinion unless I have contributed to all and sundry capital raises. At this stage to walk away from Inca doesn't make sense to me and I too hope that this next round of drilling returns a positive result.
Perhaps the replies from a lot of LT holders (as I am) to posters stating their desire to see a ROI shouldn't always be related to whether they have contibuted to Capital Raises or how long they have held stock.
Just my opinion.
ICG Price at posting:
0.6¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)