Kranky,further to your statement;''Why ann "a number of parties"...

Kranky,further to your statement;

''Why ann "a number of parties" literally days ago, with the the hoopla that conjured up and then conveniently remove it in this ann, but mention 3 seperate parties - Arup, GW and Monash?''

IMO,


Because they relate to different works in progress ?

One to securing an extra layer of contingency confidence which fits into the matrix chronologically ?

otherwise;

why delay the AGM in the first place ?

the market is now aware that ALL is in place to complete the so called Monash deal,,,

There is indeed a Monash type Module funding deal in progress,,,, the market is aware of the c/o the recent announcements.

ESI by their actions to the ASX yesterday demonstrated imo that they are / were mindful of the fact that with so many parties at the table,,,, the potential for a disorderly market existed yesterday,,,so with this reflected yesterday, you would have to consider, a further Mkt sensitive TH situation exists NOW, given the nature of just where everyone sits poised atm ?