Ann: Capital Raising Update, App3B and Section 708(A) notice, page-263

@anatol - I think you are mistaken with your comments here. The specific gravity of lithium minerals vs tin (or tantalum) is completely irrelevant here.

The truth is that we don't know the exact distribution of tin, tantalum and lithium here yet, but it is fair to say there will probably be at least some overlap. The historical information on Manono suggests this, evidence as provided by @mineralised
If you look at Pilgangoora and Wodgina they both have overlapping/coincident resources of tantalum (similar properties to tin) and spodumene. In fact, the lithium resource released yesterday by MIN at Wodgina is located at the Mt Cassiterte pit. You have to ask how they managed a lithium resource in the tailings (tailings from ore that was mined for tantalum), if tantalum and lithium are not coincident.! There is some tin in the ore in the Wodgina area. I am also aware that at nearly Stannum, both lithium and tin occur together.

Let's wait and see what the drilling shows, but I think at at a minimum there will be SOME areas where they occur together.

Another observation about your posting here Anatol - I think you are yet to acknowledge your errors regarding the doubt you cast over the licence that AVZ have, in that it does in fact cover the Manono mine as proven by numerous other posters, nor the error regarding the spodumene vs lepidolite mineralogy that you were suggesting, when the document you were referencing was clearly relating to the mica chemistry only, not the spodumene ore zones.

Happy to hear constructive questions, but you appear to be inventing/exaggerating any problems here. It's poor form. After your good quality posting on other stocks, I thought you were better than that.