"There are no other intercepts near this value."... that is the glaring discrepancy makes it jump out as wrong. 1.9% Nb2O5 is an order of magnitude higher than what were classed as "significant Intersections" by DRE on intervals that average above cut-off (including up to 3m dilution). It just doesn't make any sense for a 31m interval to average 1.9% Nb2O5 in hole 51 when other large intervals in better mineralised areas (ie C3) struggle to get over 0.19%. Looks like a data error, only makes geological sense as a data error...
Regards the text you quoted, those are "peak value" for 1m samples (or 3m comps) so 1.84% Nb2O5 is just a coincidence I would say. There are no intervals in the table at 17.6% P2O5 or 22.8% TiO2 either, just lower than peak downhole averages.
"There are no other intercepts near this value."... that is the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add DRE (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.0¢ |
Change
-0.001(4.76%) |
Mkt cap ! $70.26M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.0¢ | 2.1¢ | 2.0¢ | $103.9K | 5.161M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 8253903 | 2.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1¢ | 1266017 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| DRE (ASX) Chart |