Para 1 - yes. Perhaps the EM is 'finding' pyrrhotite richer areas - there may be other zones where pentlandite, chalcopyrite are richer. Layered intrusive Ni/Cu/PGM deposits can have marked zonation. This was discussed in the 1972 paper (which is excellent and written by a number of noted (academic and field) geologists)
The step out drilling will/will not confirm (yes lots more work to do)
Para 2 - conductivity and magnetism do have an inter-relationship. Lorenz and Faraday will confirm. A mineral may be none of these, either, or both. A mineral that is both (pyrrhotite) will give stronger EM response.
Anyway lets see what hole 43 hits ( an important hole towards any size extent)
Para 1 - yes. Perhaps the EM is 'finding' pyrrhotite richer...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ESR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $26.14M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.3¢ | 1.4¢ | 1.3¢ | $25.64K | 1.867M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 5110125 | 1.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4¢ | 3864762 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 01/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ESR (ASX) Chart |