Buddy, you need to study the official database. It has a few...

Buddy, you need to study the official database. It has a few metallic deposits listed for Castor (but that does not mean JORC resources or so, so hold your horses). For example, a vanadium-bearing titanoferrous magnetite deposit (but I read it is just a very narrow vein, but over hundreds of meters??? Baie Chapus - see below), copper/nickel anomalies, and potentially PGMs and gold. Our neighbours have been hunting for gold (for example Harfang - so I would expect we also have good gold potential (and maybe they discovered old gold mines in the Lidar survey?).

In fact, I personally believe one reason for Dahrouge and Kal Malhi to get these tenements in the first place, and to keep 20% of our Castor project, is the prospectivity for copper/nickel, PGMs, and gold. That might have resonated well with SUM management because they diversify risk - not only Li but also other interesting metals. Also Jody Dahrouge keeps highlighting on Twitter that the James Bay greenstone belts are not just prospective for Li but also Ni etc...

https://sigeom.mines.gouv.qc.ca/signet/classes/I1108_afchCarteIntr

From Sigeom:

Baie Chapus
The ore body is located approximately 10.5 km ENE of the northeastern tip of Kowskatehkakmow Lake. The coordinates mentioned relate to the position of the geofiche outcrop 96-JG-1331 (RG 98-16).Comment - morphology: This is a mineralized horizon one meter wide. The other dimensions of the ore body, as well as the attitude, are not known.Comment - discovery: Deposit with outcrop discovered in 1996 during 1:50,000 mapping.Comment - lithology: The host rock is a medium and coarse grained pyroxenite with a dark green to bluish hue. It consists almost exclusively of poorly metamorphosed clinopyroxene with interstitial plagioclase. In places, the rock has a pegmatitic texture with clusters of 5 to 70 cm of plagioclase and centimetric pyroxenes. **bro dykes cut the peridotite. In addition, in a few places, metric to decametric enclaves of peridotite are also observed. Peridotite is easily distinguished by its orange-brown patina and by raised magnetite stringers.Comment - mineralization: The mineralization is massive to disseminated and consists of titaniferous and vanadiferous magnetite. Disseminated chalcopyrite (<2%) was observed locally in two locations in the pyroxenite.Substance - how: CONTENTS - Selected sample (RG 98-16): 96-JG-1331: 45.81% Fe (65.5% Fe2O3), 5.44% Ti (9.07% TiO2), 0.33 % V (0.59% V2O5) and 0.24% Cu. Less than 500 meters to the north, grab sample 1053565 returned grades of >50% Fe, 4710 ppm V and 6.61% Ti. Sample 1053574 (duplicate of 1053565) also returned grades of >50% Fe, 4630 ppm V and 6.58% Ti. Sample 1053576 also returned significant grades of 32.40% Fe, 1700 ppm V and 3.94% Ti (GM 67726).Structural control - comment: The mineralization is in a horizon consistent with the stratigraphy.Alteration - comment: No information is available.Typology: Iron and Titanium deposits in mafic intrusionsComment - typology: Typology: Magmatic mineralization of vanadiferous magnetite in a late-tectonic ultramafic intrusion.

Sample K433872 locates the ore body (GM 69426).
Comment - morphology: The dimensions of the ore body are unknown. On the surface, the ultramafic intrusion extends over more than 3 km in length by 1 km in width (GM 69426; SIGÉOM).
Comment - discovery: The discovery was made by prospecting during the 2015 exploration campaign (GM 69426).
Comment - lithology: The main lithology is the ultramafic intrusive of Chapus Bay (GM 69426).
Comment - mineralization: Traces of malachite were observed in outcrops. Locally, we also note traces of pyrite and pyrrhotite in the ultramafic country (GM 69426).
Substance - how: Grades: Grab sample K433872 returned grades of 0.14 ppm Au, 5,410 ppm Cu, 1.16 g/t PGE (0.299 g/t Pt and 0.861 g/t Pd) . At 10 m to the SE, sample K433873 also returned 5,380 ppm Cu and 1,885 ppm Ni (GM 69426).
Structural control - comment: Malachite is associated with the ultramafic unit (GM 69426).
Alteration - comment: No alteration has been reported (GM 69426).
Typology: Magmatic or hydrothermal Ni-Cu-PGE
Comment - typology: It appears to be magmatic or hydrothermal nickel-copper-PGE type mineralization in ultramafic intrusive rocks.

GLTAH!