Hi Asa4x4. I'm not sure which posters you think are paid, but I...

Hi Asa4x4. I'm not sure which posters you think are paid, but I reckon I can guess. Personally, I wouldn't care if they were paid. I just want to see some evidence that they are wrong. The criticism of the "naysayers" is all very general - such as suggesting they are invested in "other" competing companies, or name calling (Clowns? Really?), or that they are repeating themselves. Not all, but most (of the people who are NOT fans of OSL and their management) are, for the most part, being objective, from what I read. You don't have to agree with them, but it would be a lot more effective and believable to disprove their statements if they are clearly wrong - using facts that are indisputable. I see very little of that. I used to have a decent position in OSL, and, as I have said here before, I lost faith in management, so sold all of my OSL position. So, why do I read these threads and sometimes add comments? Simply because I really don't know for sure if I did the right thing or the wrong thing - and I'm still looking for answers. I have plenty of questions, and not enough answers. What I see are three main groups. The hopeful - who don't know, but they hope everything will turn out OK, the cheer squad, who won't have anybody say anything against their beloved company and don't mind a bit of bullying and name-calling, and the reality-checkers, who are trying to balance the hype and promise with some reality and some facts. The arguments of the third group have been a LOT more convincing than those of the second. If they are wrong, just explain WHY they are wrong. How hard can that be?