You're right 2Chance but EMH still went with roasting not LMAx. I believe the reason is that they did not have results from a large, continuous trial to support the costing and commercialisation claims.
You might be interested in an email I got from Keith Coughlan ( MD EMH) mid 2016.
"We are not considering SiLeach at all at this point in time.
If they are able to demonstrate any real results with independent test work, and an application for the technology to treat our waste, we may consider.
Kind regards
Keith"
LIT claims Sileach has significantly advanced since then and have already selected a contractor to build a large scale test plant this year. EMH wont be fully committed by then, so the plant which could also trial LMax might change Keith’s mind.
So cooperation with LIT may still be the best way forward for LPD.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LPD
- Ann: Ceasing to be a substantial holder from PWN
Ann: Ceasing to be a substantial holder from PWN, page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LPD (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $17.17M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | $6.924K | 3.462M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
77 | 66271174 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 76066224 | 49 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
77 | 66271174 | 0.002 |
72 | 184239870 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 76066224 | 49 |
0.004 | 29137489 | 33 |
0.005 | 12657535 | 10 |
0.006 | 2391995 | 7 |
0.007 | 1047189 | 5 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 19/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LPD (ASX) Chart |