Must have been an off market transaction - 6th Feb was during suspension - it was a return of collateral - so they must have found another holder to borrow them off to settle their prior transaction.
Have to laugh that they incurred costs for holding a short during a suspension - obviously they didn't see that coming - or expect it to happen for as long as it did. Reality is we should expect a fall when the next announcement comes out - maybe they know something about the results and figured it wasn't worth maintaining the short?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SDA
- Ann: Ceasing to be a substantial holder
Ann: Ceasing to be a substantial holder, page-5
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some