Ann: Ceasing to be a substantial holder, page-38

Thanks for your reply to my post. I agree with what your response to my post. However if I might point out, I didn't try to discount dorios' entire post. I disagreed only with the approach of putting a lot of random comparisons' together + also the immorality of what he was really trying to say to the supposed 'losers who didn't listen'..

As you might see from my past replies to dorios, I do think this poster researches the stock they are talking about - even if they appear to have a different agenda to mine. I don't have anyone on ignore ever, even if I disagree..because I do value reading everything about a company..

But if a poster starts randomly putting stuff together - and then advertises a skewed picture of a company that I part-own (without any qualifiers attached like markfrazer89 posted).....well, I am going to put forth my SH perspective about it too....