Ann: Ceasing to be a substantial holder, page-49

It isn't him Sam. I can't state that as fact, but nothing adds up. All that matters is peoples own personal risk assessment on what this means. If it is him, he has blown anyones trust in him.

Negative - The major holder has sold 40% of his shares on the precipice of our tech being 'finalised' ready to take to market. What info is he in possession of that has driven such a drastic reduction on what is being sold as the moment we achieve our goal. And no matter what people think, this guy will likely be in possession of more 'insights' than you or I. While it may not be insider info, he may have been privy to the tone of conversations, more context around next steps. If he hasn't had personal discussions with the board I'd be surprised.

Positive - The major holder remains a major holder with many many millions of shares still in possession. If all bad, why not sell the lot. He is still heavily exposed (for now).

Neutral - Bit from column A, bit from column B. Who cares. There will be another pump, it's inevitable. Just sit tight and wait for that, then decide at the next major inflection point how much risk you intend to hold.