Ann: Ceasing to be a substantial holder, page-25

No problem Audi8v, was not being accusative or the like. It was just the brief wording that I think some might have jumped to conclusions, hence my inclusion of CH's actual comments.

I also see it as a positive amongst all the smoke and mirrors from MUFG and JP Morgan Chase at the moment. At some stage I will scrutinize the 44 pages and look for signs of manipulation of price or market. It almost smacks of their ben counters trying to keep them under the radar but then stuffed up by borrowing too many shares to put them over the 5% and then quickly getting rid of them to go back under the radar .. but a reputable financial firm would NEVER resort to those tactics, would they??? Any other possible explanations for becoming and ceasing to be a substantial holder over the space of 3 days when both documents itemize transactions from Nov '23 to 15th March '24. Have stated a few times I would love to see a forensic accountant's take on this and I am sure there are many suitably qualified individuals at ASX and ASIC who could do that but probably have been told by someone 'don't go there'.