Sounds like it doesn't it.
There was some selling but the majority was a return to the original owner suggesting the shorts have left.
Could also be that they needed the shares back to vote in the resolutions.
What is strange to me is that the shares were loaned for shorting in the first place as the shares are rock bottom already so I never saw a real margin for shorting effectively.
Its also unusual for shorters to target such a spec stock as it would only take one contract to shift the share price against them making it a risky bet.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
