So the original owners that got us into this mess are considering legal action once it's all done? They say that the parent company (EML) is responsible for all the legal fees for all their past activity and not themselves?
Then you have this line part of the article and you can also see it from the previous owner's point of view....
"EML clarified in August that the Central Bank had not identified any instances of financial crime, anti-money laundering or counter-terrorism financing events, nor deficiencies with respect to safeguarding, capital adequacy or solvency measures."
So the original owners that got us into this mess are...
Add EML (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
93.8¢ |
Change
0.018(1.90%) |
Mkt cap ! $348.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 92.0¢ | 94.0¢ | 92.0¢ | $1.362M | 1.466M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | 27779 | 93.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 94.0¢ | 10997 | 10 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.25pm 07/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
93.0¢ |
Change
0.018 ( 0.93 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 93.0¢ | 94.0¢ | 92.0¢ | 67586 | ||
| Last updated 12.41pm 07/06/2024 ? | |||||
| EML (ASX) Chart |