If it is imperative to the project that Mr Hay stays, then this should have been negotiated at the time of the agreement with GF, including remuneration.
Mali & GF are the only ones who will benefit from Simon remaining with the project, not shareholders. Our fate is sealed.
So I ask why do Leo shareholders have to pay for this privilege?? How does this increase in salary & bonuses, back dated to January mind you, benefit us...?? It doesn't.
Send the invoice to GF & the tip rats in Mali.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: CEO Remuneration Update
If it is imperative to the project that Mr Hay stays, then this...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 37 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LLL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
50.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $605.4M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
LLL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable