same ole same ole - nothing about revenue positive, Change the chairman me says!!!! need change at the top to get things moving with "fresh eyes" IMO.
anyhow address did nothing to excite me. what'se everyone else think?. did i miss something?. would like to know at what stage the 2 products they ceased development of because they realised that costs would likely be in excess of expected revenues and what the costs to that point were!. this should have been done prior to commencement of the development process as IMO if it doesnt stack up now how did it then? - and if it did stack up prior to development commencement what changed to suddenly make it not feasible anymore - oh the transparency here)
and were bonuses paid on those ceased products if they moved past KPI's?
yes a "pivotal stage" alright - so whens the CR?
same ole same ole - nothing about revenue positive, Change the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
