Hi Regarding point 2., that was the point of my own query!...

Hi
Regarding point 2., that was the point of my own query!

Regarding point 1.; not fully certain as the descriptions in the notation are general in nature-I do note that the 2017 expected expense for operating lease commitments is set out in the table as $83m, which is a $13m reduction on the 2016 expense committed at the end of 2015. I am unsure if this reduction will flow directly into the bottom line at the same quantum.

The $24m might be part of the difference, i.e. Net reduction of $23m over entire period.