From Heugh's WA Supreme Court determination alone, it shows Heugh was wrongfully terminated and " he should receive his remuneration for the balance of his contract and in addition compensation for loss of opportunity for a pay increase, loss of opportunity to accrue long service leave and renew his contract in the future.”
IMO, shareholders were also badly affected to the extent that their expectations were negatively impacted because of Heugh's wrongful sacking and subsequent change of management, oil potential sidelined and shareholder value degraded.
... and Haasko, old fella, ... obviously, some posters should not be on this forum or the other because of closeness or connection with the company, unlike ordinary shareholders or traders..
"The co-founder of mining company Central Petroleum has been awarded almost $1.6 million in damages for unfair dismissal.
John Heugh started the business with Richard Faull and didn’t draw a salary in the nine years before the company listed in 2006.
The chief executive was ousted after mining billionaire Clive Palmer made a bid to control Central Petroleum’s board. Justice Rene Lucien Le Miere found Heugh was wrongfully terminated by Central Petroleum.
“Central was not entitled to terminate Mr Heugh's employment for the reasons stated in the termination letter because Mr Heugh remedied the serious breach of contract relied upon and further Central's decision to terminate Mr Heugh's employment for that reason was not a reasonable exercise of its discretion to terminate the employment,” he found. SmartCompany contacted Heugh through his lawyers but did not receive a response prior to publication.
Central Petroleum said in a statement to the Australian Securities Exchange it was in consultation with its insurers and would consider its options for an appeal.
Emma Starkey, senior associate at law firm Maurice Blackburn, told SmartCompany the payout is one of the biggest in an employment dispute.
“It’s important to note that the size of the payout arose from the terms of [Heugh’s] contract so it is a unique situation to him and his scenario,” she says.
“The court took the view that [Central Petroleum] wrongfully terminated his contract and in order to remedy that he should receive his remuneration for the balance of his contract and in addition compensation for loss of opportunity for a pay increase, loss of opportunity to accrue long service leave and renew his contract in the future.”
Starkey says the critical issue is the way Central Petroleum terminated Heugh’s employment as it had an obligation to terminate at reasonable discretion and the court took the view the decision to terminate was not reasonable discretion.
She says the court found Heugh had taken certain steps in breach of his contract but he had fixed it up at the request of the employer, once he had done that the court said he had no basis to terminate the employment contract.
“This case really demonstrates the importance of looking at your employment contract before you start and having protections against an employer unilaterally terminating your employment,” he says.
“It’s also important for employers to remember to exercise their reasonable discretion.” "
CTP Price at posting:
17.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
