The point from my corner is simply this: good corporate...

The point from my corner is simply this: good corporate governance is value accretive. Therefore there is detriment unquantified from the structures of the past that should be addresses rapidly. The rate of change is far too slow given the circumstances.

baraka makes a sound point about separate resolutions and I'm thinking 1 out of 3 would actually be a workable and reasonable outcome.

For a publicly listed company that has tapped the market for significant sums over time the governance structures are woefully inadequate and must be fixed. Fast.