Ann: Chairman's Update - May 2016-IWG.AX, page-8

throwtheslider>"Have you confirmed that the $200K is in fact billing issued by the channel or by IWG, or are you just creating your own narrative again?"

I have just re-read the Chairman's statement and it seems as clear as any other of iWebGate's ambiguous statements. $200K billed via the partner program. As you say, the purpose of going via the channel is that the channel does the invoicing, so I think it is reasonable to interpret that as meaning the channel has billed $200K.

You are just backing up my original point. They are mixing up terms and making it hard to get a clear picture. They obviously have the complete information and can make the position crystal clear if they choose to. They are are choosing not to, and you can make of that what you will. But until they make it clear I think we are allowed to "create our own narrative" from the information we are provided.