As a rule of thumb if a company pays about 50% of its EPS as...

  1. 4,309 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1242
    As a rule of thumb if a company pays about 50% of its EPS as DPS, then the SP tends not to drop below a 4% yield. The 4% is a metric mooted by Rudi Filapek of FNArena. I added the DPS/EPS ratio as a crude way of saying that the dividend must be sustainable. Remember with franking credits, 4% translates to about 6%. If TGA does no better than meet the Thomson Consensus Estimates, then its SP should not fall below about 9.5¢ ÷ 4%, which is $2.375. If we use 5% to be conservative, we get $2.00 – at the current SP of about $2.160, TGA's SP is anything but “lofty”. The Thomson Consensus Estimates are:

    - - - - - 2012 – 2013 – 2014 – 2015
    EPS - - 19.0 - - 19.4 - -19.6 - - 22.3
    DPS - - - 9.5 - -10.0 - -10.3 - -11.3

    If you are looking for lofty SPs to short, there are many better candidates than TGA. IVC at circa $11.900 has a PER of about 29 and a dividend yield of about 3%. That is in my opinion a lofty SP. IVC's Thomson Consensus Estimates are:

    - - - - - 2012 – 2013 – 2014 – 2015
    EPS - - 40.6 - - 43.3 - - 48.0 - - 52.9
    DPS - - 34.0 - - 37.8 - - 42.0 - - 46.0

    IVC has a higher dividend payout ratio. There is nothing magic about the 50% payout that I suggested in my opening sentence – it was just a crude way of saying there should be some leeway to fund growth and handle the odd EPS dip, and this tends to be about 50%, but can be higher for some businesses.

    What I am hoping for is that TGA gets back to its recent EPS/DPS trajectory as TEF and other relatively recent initiatives gain traction. SIV for example, has a PER of about 19 and a dividend yield of about 3.5%. SIV's Thomson Consensus Estimates are:

    - - - - - 2012 – 2013 – 2014 – 2015
    EPS - - 40.0 - - 44.3 - - 49.4
    DPS - - 24.0 - - 31.0 - - 33.5

    I am a surprised that SIV pays a highish dividend relative to earnings, because it carries a lot of debt and if my memory serves me right, it recently stuck out a hand for an equity injection to fund growth.

    In principle, TGA's TEF initiative is similar to SIV's business – financing items in the SME market. My main gripe about TGA's NCML acquisition is not that it paid too much for it, but that it was a distraction, and various organic innitiatives like Cashfirst and TEF should have enjoyed that funding and management attention instead of NCML.

    This post has run away from me. All I wanted to say is that I do not think TGA's current SP is lofty – it is depressed if anything, which is why I hold, and hope that it might become lofty one day. In spite of that, I am ahead on my average buy price of $1.215, and the dividend I get suffices to meet my living costs.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
$3.52
Change
-0.050(1.40%)
Mkt cap ! $2.360B
Open High Low Value Volume
$3.56 $3.57 $3.49 $5.287M 1.500M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 9329 $3.50
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
$3.53 5000 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.20pm 26/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
IFL (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.