Im not sure, for a company with their fingers in many pies Hancock may see strategic value rather than pure project economics. (i.e. pay overs fir the gas because it will save them money in other areas, or they achievewider project economics by feeding it into a larger LNG liquefaction plant)
NWE has one project, no capital for development, no interests in downstream mining, chemicals or LNG exports. As an NWE holder your valuation should be based on the economics of the project, not a strategic play like Hancock or MIN.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Change in substantial holding from MIN
Im not sure, for a company with their fingers in many pies...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 65 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)